Editorial rejection: “you aren’t citing articles of Statistical Papers”

Editorial rejection: “you aren’t citing articles of Statistical Papers”

The journal Statistical Papers, with editorial office at the University of Dortmund rejects all manuscript submissions in the event that writers usually do not cite documents using this journal that is springer-published. The editors claim its perhaps not about effect element rigging.

A request from editors to cite some random earlier papers from same journal from time to time, scientists submitting their work for publication encounter. Why? One explanation: it does increase the effect factor. In reality, for many journals it’s perhaps the rule that is unofficial such journal-self-citations are anticipated, or your paper may be refused. Some boffins abide ahead of time, which will make editors delighted. Many other people fight with the idea which they find unethical. The German editor of this Springer log Statistical Papers will explain for you right right right here why here is the scientifically proper and completely objective option to run a journal.

A conversation grew up on Twitter recently, for the duration of which neither the log perhaps perhaps not the editor had been known as.

Mark Hayter, teacher of medical at University of Hull in UK and a log editor himself, tweeted:

“A PhD student of mine possessed a paper accepted – one condition of acceptance ended up being that she ratings her references and includes any appropriate current papers through the accepting journal”

Then he included the log was “Not predatory. Distinguished journal, person in COPE and from a big,international publishing house” and in addition specified that “They asked her to examine her sources you need to include ‘recent, relevant’ documents through the accepting Journal. No certain documents had been suggested“. Ended up, Hayter had not been alone with that experience:

A reviewer ( perhaps maybe not editor) as soon as told us to include citations from that log in my own revision. a journal that is top. Very strange. I obtained within the practice of including a few journal cites to wherever I’m submitting and very nearly forget to give some thought to the ethics. It is waking me up.

More anecdotes arrived, like that one through the part of medication:

Certainly plagiarism checker, an approach to falsely impact that is inflate.

There is another worldwide cardiology log historically that insisted you cite their ethics declaration (posted as a paper).

It had been cited a great deal, their impact relocated from circa 2 to over 6 in three years. #gaming #unethical

Almost all of the replies had been critical, such as this advice through the Hindawi research integrity supervisor Matt Hodgkinson:

For many we all know, the writers may have valued the Twitter outrage after which simply did just exactly what the editor said and quoted some random documents from the log. Why enemies that are making in place of making documents? Some experts revealed also understanding when it comes to policy:

I’ve blended feelings concerning this. One argument is you are targeting a community of scholars if you choose a particular journal. It’s rational to check on whatever they have previously stated regarding the topic as well as the place that is logical begin may be the journal you’ve selected.

Now Professor Stephen John Senn of Luxembourg Institute of wellness is just a statistician, he can undoubtedly agree totally that the policy that is following of log Statistical Papers is okay since it is. I am talking about, should your tasks are written in the type of a paper and it’s also about statistics, you sure must cite something with this journal that is particularly significant exactly what aided by the title, “Statistical Papers“, right?

This is the e-mail an audience forwarded for me, a recently gotten answer his refused manuscript distribution:

Dear …., your paper has some merits. Nonetheless, because of the enormous wide range of submissions we have been getting recently we now have made a decision to give attention to documents that are linked to past work published within our log. And also this will not be seemingly the situation together with your paper because you aren’t citing articles of Statistical Papers. Furthermore, the guide list just isn’t of good quality: often all pages and posts for the log articles are missing.Thank you for offering us the chance to think about your work.Yours sincerelyChristine H. MьllerEditor-in-Chief, Statistical Papers

The EiC was contacted by me Christine Mьller, teacher of data in engineering in the Technical University of Dortmund (TU Dortmund) in Germany. She responded, confirming the e-mail authenticity:

“Due into the high quantity of submissions, we need to set strict standards, as well as 2 of these will be the quality associated with paper additionally the relationship with other papers of y our log. In the event that quality is okay and just Statistical Papers is certainly not cited then we often request a resubmission. Nevertheless, right here the high quality, suggested by the guide list, appears to be dubious.”

I happened to be unconvinced this training had nothing at all to do with the Journal effect Factor (currently at 1.345 for analytical documents) and in addition puzzled how a editors could solely judge a manuscript based on its reference formatting (“page numbers missing”). Mьller then clarified:

“we want to ensure that submissions fit to your log and an indicator that is good frequently just how well it’s attached to past work with our log. Note as you may see from checking our published articles (the self-citation rate of SP is not higher than that of comparable journals and you may be aware that anyway only cites of within 3 years affect the IF) that we generally do not judge that solely by whether another SP-paper is cited or not. Needless to say the grade of a paper isn’t judged because of the guide formatting. Nevertheless, we possess the experience that a sloppy guide list is an indication of the sloppy written paper. We genuinely believe that editors of other journals may have the same experience and can certainly make comparable conclusions. Ergo the remark in the guide part had been meant as an ongoing solution into the author.”

That e-mail had been finalized by Christine Mьller together with other two editors that are chief Carsten Jentsch, teacher of data in economics at exact exact same TU Dortmund, and Werner Mьller, teacher at Institute for Applied Statistics at University of Linz, Austria.

The journal’s writers seem to follow these unofficial editorial guidelines. We looked over initial 3 recently posted studies in Statistical Papers (all incidentally from Asia), one sources 4 documents here, another recommendations 2, 3rd recommendations 1 paper in exact exact same log. It is the range of Statistical Papers really that slim? It’s this that the log internet site states in this respect:

“Statistical Papers provides a forum when it comes to presentation and critical assessment of analytical practices. In specific, the log encourages the discussion of methodological fundamentals in addition to prospective applications.

This log stresses analytical techniques which have broad applications; but, it will provide unique awareness of analytical techniques being strongly related the economic and social sciences. Along with research that is original, visitors will discover study articles, quick records, reports on analytical pc pc computer software, issue part, and book reviews”

Nowhere it really is mentioned that the submissions must cite some random previous papers in exact same log to match the range. The assigned publisher professional from Springer opted for to not respond to my e-mails, and just why whenever they. The editors do their utmost to improve the journal’s citation index.

However for argument’s sake, if Statistical Papers is its very own split industry research, certainly the Editor-in-Chief is going to be expert when it comes to specific technology section of “Statistical Papers”? Regrettably, this woman is certainly not. a lengthy selection of magazines is posted by Christine Mьller on her behalf TU Dortmund web site, from 1984 till now, presumably her whole research production, since maybe maybe not otherwise specified. Yet just two of Mьller’s papers that are statistical in her own log Statistical Papers, that will be posted since 1960 (until 1995, even yet in German). Her namesake editor colleague Werner Mьller has also simply two papers in this journal to demonstrate, while Jentsch will not record a solitary book in Statistical Papers on their web site.

Fundamentally, these are generally field outsiders of this niche that is obscure technology of Statistical Papers, having scarcely (or perhaps not at all) published there by themselves. Or even their very own journal’s impact element is too low and requirements boosting before Mьller, Mьller & Jentsch contemplate it as being a location?

In the event that you had comparable experiences with editors imposing citation that is own-journal, please think over sharing these below within the comment area.